Letters to the Editor

Transit viewed wrongly, as are our streets

Re: Higher ridership key to ending financial woes (Letters, Oct. 10)

Robert Jones suggests that ridership is essential to curing our transit woes. I agree.

Our problem is that we view transit as a business – to be financed, regulated and taxed like any other. It is not. Like our water and sewer, like our public streets, it is a basic amenity of our lives. And while a modest user fee will serve to remind us that there is a cost, we should support transit primarily through our taxes.

We need better, simpler, easier systems of payment. I have seen in Scandinavia that most users have some sort of pass: annual, monthly or shorter term. These are even readily available for tourists. Cash payments are made, yes, but it is also possible to buy tickets by cellphone.

Along with this, we need to treat our streets as if they were revenue producers, with a fee-for-use by our cars either added to our tax bill as residents, or our license fees as non-residents.

I grant this implies tracking our movements, but that should be a minor intrusion to improve our streets, reduce congestion and encourage us into alternate transport. As it is, our cars are simply too cheap not to drive.

John A. Laidlaw

Victoria

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Big changes expected at Greater Victoria board of education
 
Errington man battling BC Hydro
 
Make every moment count in life

Community Events, November 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Nov 19 edition online now. Browse the archives.