Letters to the Editor

Push for tree protection is misguided

Why is Saanich trying to force people to retain old trees that endanger people, and young trees growing in the wrong place?

Why are mature trees considered intrinsically better than grass, gardens and shrubs (which Saanich has praised for providing shelter and food for small birds and animals)?

How is it possible to measure forest canopy coverage to within a few per cent, to make Saanich’s alarmist projection of trend?

The ‘canopy’ push comes from the council that spends its time worrying about the colour of paint on a private building instead of policing.

Why the negative view of people when evidence is all around that people plant and nurture vegetation on their land?

Why subject people to the hazard of old trees falling on houses and root damage to foundations? That’s not good behaviour for humans.

Keith Sketchley

Saanich

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Virk shuffled to new job after Kwantlen flap
 
U.S.: Cuban cigars still no smoking matter
 
Local chef competes on Chopped Canada
Cross returning to Tzouhalem lookout
 
Family frustrated with lack of progress in murder investigation
 
Australian leader: Siege may have been preventable
RAW talk about photos
 
Canada failing refugees in time of crisis
 
Editorial cartoon, Dec. 11

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 19 edition online now. Browse the archives.