Letters to the Editor

Push for tree protection is misguided

Why is Saanich trying to force people to retain old trees that endanger people, and young trees growing in the wrong place?

Why are mature trees considered intrinsically better than grass, gardens and shrubs (which Saanich has praised for providing shelter and food for small birds and animals)?

How is it possible to measure forest canopy coverage to within a few per cent, to make Saanich’s alarmist projection of trend?

The ‘canopy’ push comes from the council that spends its time worrying about the colour of paint on a private building instead of policing.

Why the negative view of people when evidence is all around that people plant and nurture vegetation on their land?

Why subject people to the hazard of old trees falling on houses and root damage to foundations? That’s not good behaviour for humans.

Keith Sketchley

Saanich

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.
Off to school, and back to court for BCTF
 
Column: Without Scotland, not so great Britain
 
Factory model fading for schools
Editorial cartoon
 
Coffee with...the man behind alberni.ca
 
Editorial cartoon, Sept. 16

Community Events, September 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Sep 17 edition online now. Browse the archives.